17 thoughts on “”

  1. I enjoyed your haiku even more than Cor’s “tundra” (-;

    I can see that you would need “hidden” rather than “hide” to make it work so well.

    It must have been a joy to have the great Bob Spiess accept your work, and I bet he sent you a nice note too.

    Thank you, and look forward to seeing more of your work.

  2. Really clever. I love the “nesting” of the words inside one another. Or I might call it “nestling”!

    Thanks!

  3. It is interesting. In my country there is the poem into one line. Since 1936. However, it has a caesura, like this reply for the Martin’s text:

    Flower out of sight: soul of woman

  4. reminds me of the old concentration gameshow.
    to really learn this craft, find a newspaper
    game called “say what you see.” clever?
    perhaps. genius? no. there is nothing new
    about this type of approach.

    doggodpeeseepsonnobob
    innitheehtmirrorrorrim

  5. In my enthusiasm about the minimal form (new to me), I neglected to mention, in my first response, the artistry & insight of “hiddenemyself” — admirable!

  6. Wonderful! I think this transcends the haiku form into what should be called Sudden Haiku.

    (I hate to do this, but someone really should, in case others don’t get it. Explaining it doesn’t really ruin it if you don’t get it in the first place. The art of this poem is that it is crafted from three words: “hidden enemy myself”)

  7. in reading an elizabeth st jacques’ article,
    i again encountered basho’s much read
    “old pond
    a frog leaps in
    water’s sound”
    does it get any better than this

    elizabeth presents a piece by emily romano’s,
    “hibiscushionswallowtail”

    can’t you feel the moment; and acceptable haiku definitives

    martin, rather mystical; but something seems lost

    humidawnecksaffronstigma…

Your response: